In May 1967, after 10 years of campaigning, a referendum on Indigenous recognition in the Australian constitution was held.
The lead-up to the poll focused public attention on the fact that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders were treated as second-class citizens.
Nearly 91 per cent of the electorate voted to amend the constitution. This change meant that Aboriginal people would be counted as part of the population and acknowledged as equal citizens, and that the Commonwealth would be able to make laws on their behalf. This was seen to reflect public recognition of Aboriginal people as full Australian citizens.
Gordon Bryant, 1967:
The vote is an overwhelming endorsement of the view that it is time for material action. The Government cannot hide behind constitutional inhibitions, nor can it hide behind a faith in public apathy. This vote represents a great national demand for action.
Aboriginal people and white law
In the 100 years following 1788, Indigenous people had their homelands and many of their human rights taken away from them by British colonists.
By the end of the 19th century, when the colonies were in the process of federating, Aboriginal people were excluded from almost all aspects of white society and most settler Australians thought of them as a ‘dying race’.
Moreover, 19th-century authorities were hesitant to apply aspects of British colonial law to Indigenous people. As Judge Dowling pronounced in the R v Ballard case of 1829: ‘I know of no reason human, or divine, which ought to justify us in interfering with their institutions even if such interference were practicable.'
Therefore, the creators of the constitution paid little consideration to Indigenous Australians. On its completion, the document contained only two significant references to Indigenous people, both exclusionary:
Section 51. The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to:-
... (xxvi) The people of any race, other than the aboriginal people in any State, for whom it is necessary to make special laws.
Section 127. In reckoning the numbers of the people of the Commonwealth, or of a State or other part of the Commonwealth, aboriginal natives should not be counted.
As historian John Hirst has explained, section 51 (xxvi) meant that the Commonwealth had no power to make laws that specifically applied to Aboriginal people. Only the six states could pass such legislation.
Section 127 excluded Aboriginal people from being counted in the census for the purpose of determining electoral boundaries. This prevented Queensland and Western Australia, with large Aboriginal populations, from securing more parliamentary seats and tax revenue.
The Commonwealth Franchise Act 1902 specifically excluded Indigenous people from voting. Indigenous people were also denied the social security benefits legislated for all other Australians throughout the first half of the 20th century.
The Aborigines Advancement League (AAL) and the New South Wales Aborigines’ Progressive Association (APA) staged a Day of Mourning on Australia Day 1938, the sesquicentenary of British settlement, in commemoration of what activist William Cooper called, ‘the whitemans [sic] seizure of our country’. It was one of the first overtly political actions to highlight the plight of Aboriginal people.
A catalyst for change came in 1956 when a group of Yarnangu people were found to be sick and malnourished in the Warburton Ranges area of the Central Desert. The people’s health, homelands and traditional lifestyles had been affected by nuclear testing conducted by the British and Australian Governments.
The Australian public were outraged when they became aware of the Yarnangu’s condition. Activists from organisations such as AAL and APA mobilised support around the treatment of Indigenous people and finally the issue reached a broad national audience.
For the first time, Australians broadly expressed a sense of shock at the plight of Aboriginal people.
In 1956 human rights activist Jessie Street highlighted which sections of the constitution were impeding the Commonwealth’s ability to implement policies that would provide financial assistance to Indigenous people. Street’s recommendations became a key part of the referendum question in 1967.
Various Aboriginal organisations began pressing the government for change. This led to the formation of the first national pressure group, the Federal Council for Aboriginal Advancement (FCAA), in Adelaide in February 1958. The first two stated goals of the FCAA were:
- Repeal of all legislation, federal and state, which discriminated against the Aborigines.
- Amendment to Commonwealth Constitution to give the Commonwealth government power to legislate for Aborigines as with all other citizens …
In 1964 the FCAA recognised Torres Strait Islanders as a distinct people and became the Federal Council for the Advancement of Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders (FCAATSI).
Early petitions and government action
In the late 1950s and early 1960s activists ran a series of petition drives to gain public support for constitutional change. The FCAA’s 1962–63 nationwide campaign garnered 100,000 signatures.
In May 1964 this brought Arthur Calwell, leader of the Labor Opposition, to table a Bill that called for a referendum to amend section 127 of the constitution. The subsequent debate focused on whether the wording of the section was discriminatory. The Bill did not pass.
Yet, public sentiment was very much for removing the two references in the constitution and Prime Minister Menzies, who had given Aboriginal people the vote in 1962, set a date for a referendum of May 1966.
However, the retirement of Menzies in January 1966 stalled the campaign’s political momentum and under their new leader, Harold Holt, the coalition government postponed the poll.
In February 1967 Attorney-General Nigel Bowden reviewed the situation and recommended to cabinet that the referendum be held soon. Cabinet agreed and a date was set – 27 May 1967.
Unlike most referendums where the central question draws opposing views, the 1967 referendum question of removing the controversial references in the constitution had bipartisan political support and so a national ‘no’ case was not presented.
FCAATSI took on the responsibility of campaigning for the ‘yes’ vote, with significant support from unions, churches and the Labor Party.
It framed the campaign in much the same way it had approached the early petition campaigns as a poll on the elimination of discriminatory laws and the institution of civil rights for the Aboriginal population.
FCAATSI believed the 1967 vote for change had to be overwhelming so the government would take their new responsibilities seriously.
A ‘national campaign directorate’ with Kungarakan man Joe McGinness and Labor politician Gordon Bryant as its heads, and Faith Bandler as the New South Wales Coordinator, took leading roles in what became the most successful referendum campaign in Australia’s history
Victory and the aftermath
On 27 May 1967 nearly 91 per cent of Australians voted 'yes' to change the constitution. The huge majority was a validation of 10 years of hard work by Aboriginal activists. The constitution was formally changed on 10 August that year.
Five months after the referendum, Prime Minister Holt announced the formation of the Council for Aboriginal Affairs. In 1968 the government passed the States Grants (Aboriginal Advancement) Act, which provided federal funds to state governments to support Indigenous communities.
With the election of the Whitlam Labor government in 1972, Gordon Bryant became the first Minister for Aboriginal Affairs supported by an independent department.
The referendum has iconic status in Australian history.
It was the first time the nation came together to show overwhelming support for Indigenous people, and the first time Aboriginal people were able to mobilise the non-indigenous population to make that happen. For non-Aboriginal people, it has become a benchmark event in imagining how Australia can overcome discrimination against Indigenous people.
However, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders continue to struggle for their position in Australian society. As Joe McGinness cautioned supporters in 1967, ‘Winning the referendum is an important step forwards – but it is only a first step.'
There are calls for another referendum to amend the constitution further, removing section 25, which allows the States to ban people from voting based on their race, and the amended version of section 51 (xxvi).
In May 2017 a gathering of 250 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders endorsed the Uluru Statement from the Heart. This document, presented to the Australian people, outlines a path forward for recognising Indigenous Australians in the constitution.
It proposes a First Nations voice to parliament and a Makarrata Commission ‘to supervise a process of agreement-making between governments and First Nations and truth-telling about our history'.
So far the federal government has refused to propose a referendum to change the constitution in line with the requests outlined in the statement.
Defining Moments in Australian History 24 May 2017
Defining Moments 1967 referendum panel discussion
In our collection
Bain Attwood and Andrew Markus, The 1967 Referendum, Race, Power and the Australian Constitution, Aboriginal Studies Press, Canberra, 2007.
Faith Bandler, Turning the Tide: A Personal History of the Federal Council for the Advancement of Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders, Canberra, Aboriginal Studies Press, 1989.
Jack Horner, Seeking Racial Justice: An Insider’s Memoir of the Movement for Aboriginal Advancement, 1938–1978, Canberra, Aboriginal Studies Press, 2004.