You are in site section:

Harvester Judgement

Defining Moments in Australian History

Warning: This website includes images and names of deceased people that may cause sadness or distress to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

Harvester Judgement

1907: Justice HB Higgins hands down ‘Harvester Judgement’


Henry Bourne Higgins

In 1907, Justice Henry Bourne Higgins, President of the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Court, set the first federally arbitrated wages standard in Australia.

Using the Sunshine Harvester Factory as a test case, Justice Higgins took the pioneering approach of hearing evidence from not only male workers but also their wives to determine what was a fair and reasonable wage for a working man to support a family of five.

Higgins’s ruling became the basis for setting Australia’s minimum wage standard for the next 70 years.

More on the 'Harvester Judgement'

Justice Henry Bourne Higgins, 1907:

I selected Mr McKay's application out of some 112 applications made by Victorian manufacturers because I found that the factory was one of the largest, and had the greatest numbers and variety of employees; and because his application was to be keenly fought.

Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Court

In the late 19th century, as the six colonies were discussing Federation, community leaders were also investigating the need to resolve industrial disputes without resorting to violence, as had occurred in the 1890s shearers’ strikes and the 1892 Broken Hill miners’ strike. The answer seemed to be in the formation of a special court that would hear both workers’ and employers’ grievances.

The Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Court, which was formed in 1904, was championed by the federal Trade and Customs Minister Charles Cameron Kingston who had passed similar legislation as Premier of South Australia in 1894. However, the Bill that would establish the court was controversial and the process of passing it brought down two governments.

Sunshine Harvester Company

In the same year that the court was established, the Victorian industrialist Hugh Victor McKay moved his agricultural implements manufacturing concern, the Sunshine Harvester Company, from Ballarat to the Melbourne suburb of Braybrook, which was renamed Sunshine three years later.

McKay had invented the Sunshine Harvester, one of the first machines in the world to successfully strip, thresh, winnow and bag grain. The harvester was incredibly successful and at its peak in the 1920s the factory employed 3000 workers and was the largest manufacturing plant in Australia.

With the huge growth in employees and the increasing specialisation of work, the Sunshine Harvester labour force, as with most workplaces in Australia at the time, was becoming more unionised and aware of its rights.

Postcard showing the exterior of the Sunshine Harvester Works.
Postcard showing Sunshine Harvester Works, 1910. Museum Victoria.

Fair and reasonable wages

In 1906, the federal government passed the Excise Tariff Act as a means of progressing its arbitration agenda. The legislation required all employers who did not award a ‘fair and reasonable wage’ to pay a tax on the products they sold. McKay’s wages were deemed not to be reasonable and fair but McKay felt otherwise and so applied for an exemption from the tax.

The application was chosen by the new President of the Conciliation and Arbitration Court, Henry Bourne Higgins, as a benchmark case because the Sunshine Harvester Works was, as he said, ‘one of the largest (factories) and had the greatest number and variety of employees’.

Higgins grabbed the initiative in what was his first case with the court. In his findings, he defined the worker as a ‘… human being in a civilized community’ entitled to marry and raise a family. The wages paid had to reflect the reality of a worker providing the basic needs for a family of five and to define this Higgins took the radical approach of interviewing not only male workers but also their wives.

During the hearings, which took place between 7 October and 8 November 1907, the court examined 11 households. Higgins drew on this ‘cost of living’ evidence to account for general expenses, including light, clothes, boots, furniture, insurance, union membership, sickness, books, newspapers, alcohol, and tobacco. He also took submissions from the workers’ unions and company representatives.

A photo of men at work inside the Sunshine Harvester Works.
Sunshine Harvester Works interior, 1910. Museum Victoria.

The judgement

In his judgement, Higgins calculated that a fair and reasonable wage for manual workers was seven shillings per day or 42 shillings per week. This was a 27% increase on the average unskilled worker’s salary at the Sunshine Harvester Works.

Henry Bourne Higgins
Henry Bourne Higgins, 1851–1929, President of the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Court, National Library of Australia, obj-136708449.

The decision was a landmark case because, for the first time, employers were challenged to formulate wages on the basic needs of their employees rather than being solely concerned with the company’s profits.

Not surprisingly, McKay was disappointed with the decision. He refused to pay the excise tax and took the case to the High Court (of which Higgins was also a judge).

In 1908, the High Court ruled that the Harvester Judgement was unconstitutional, invalid and void, because the Constitution permitted the Commonwealth to levy customs and excise duties but not to determine wages and working conditions.

The Harvester Judgement became more a statement of good intentions than a triumph of workers’ entitlements.

However, the concept that employers should take into account the needs of workers and their families became the starting point for all minimum wage negotiations in Australia up until the 1970s and has helped the nation become a world leader in setting minimum wages and conditions for workers.

Harvester judgement film

Further reading

Henry Bourne Higgins on the Australian Dictionary of Biography website

Harvester Judgement on the Museum Victoria website

Stuart Macintyre, ‘A Fair wage’, Winners and Losers: The Pursuit of Social Justice in Australian History, Sydney, Allen & Unwin, 1985.

John Rickard, H.B. Higgins. The Rebel as Judge, George Allen and Unwin, Sydney, New South Wales, 1984.

PG McCarthy, 'Justice Higgins and the Harvester Judgement' in Jill Roe (ed), Social Policy in Australia 1901–1975, Cassell, 1976.

From our collection

Sunshine Harvester
Sunshine Harvester
The cutting-edge combine harvester, Melbourne factory tour and the 1911 strike.

Related Defining Moments

1856: Melbourne building workers win an eight-hour day

1884: Hugh Victor McKay invents the Sunshine Harvester, which could harvest, thresh and winnow wheat

1885: Victorian Employers’ Union formed

1890–91: Depression and strikes; formation of the Labor Party

1904: Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration established

1908: Legislation introducing national age and invalid pensions

1912: Australian Government introduces a maternity allowance

1945: National introduction of unemployment and sickness benefits

1972: Conciliation and Arbitration Commission grants equal pay for men and women

< Previous Next >

Other featured moments from this period

1907: Rugby league splits from rugby union
1906: World’s first feature-length film The Story of the Kelly Gang produced in Victoria
1901: Inauguration of the Commonwealth of Australia
1900: Bubonic plague arrives in Australia
1907: Australia’s first lifesaving club established at Bondi, Sydney
1906: Australia takes control of Papua as an ‘external territory’

Browse related featured moments

Topics:Industry and workPolitics and legislation Places:Victoria Curriculum subjects:Economics and BusinessHistory School years:Year 7Year 9